MBTI® Talk Blog

On CPP.com!

We’ve added more activities online so that you can download what you need, when you need it. The MBTI® Activity Series is a collection of time-tested activities that bring type to life, make it useful, and help individuals…

Learn how to use the MBTI® Step II^™ assessment and take your leadership, coaching, and team development initiatives to a whole new level. The MBTI Step II (Form Q) tool offers a more detailed view of the 16 four-letter types…

If you would like to learn about the MBTI® Step II™ instrument, I hope you will check out an article I wrote for the World Type Alliance. Click here to access the article.

People who score in the midzone on Methodical–Emergent tend to go with an Emergent style when they are familiar with a project and a Methodical style if what they are doing is new to them. If they consider themselves an…

People who score in the midzone on Scheduled–Spontaneous tend to keep lists of things to do at work while being more spontaneous at home, or visa versa. They may like establishing routines for some things in their life but not…

You told us what you wanted and we responded – whether you are a newly certified practitioner or just looking for a refresher on the MBTI® Step II™ assessment, this program is for you.

The MBTI® Step II™ Training Program*…

People who score in the midzone on Early Starting–Pressure-Prompted tend to feel most comfortable when they don’t start too early or too late. They tend to become unmotivated when they start a project too early, but they also don’t like…

People who score in the midzone on Planful–Open-Ended tend to be Planful in one setting and Open-Ended in another. For example, they might make long-term plans at home while preferring to keep things less constraining at work, or vice versa.…

People who score in the midzone on Systematic–Casual tend to prefer having a general plan that allows for contingencies. They may like an interruption from time to time as long as they are not working on their own plans, or…

People with midzone results on Tough-Tender tend to start with a Tender approach when implementing a decision, but if that fails they will try a Tough approach. This can cause confusion when they suddenly switch approaches. Others may wonder what…